[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternatives to LaTeX
- To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to LaTeX
- From: Hans Aberg <haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:45:03 +0200
- Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
At 09:21 97-04-17, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>> The sorry thing that there are not many math font families to choose
>> from, and one idea of the math encoding project was trying to help changing
>No: the maths font encoding project was just that: a means to sort out
>the sorry mess that's arisen with umpteen fonts (from Knuth, the AMS,
>Washington, St Mary's Road, Old Uncle Tom Cobley and all) each with
>their own encodings of small parts of the problem, each independently
>encoded, but with some duplicated glyphs.
>The chances of anyone doing more than synthesis are small...
If the purpose is only to restructure the math glyphs already available,
and nothing else, I cannot see the point of nothering about it at all,
because even messy, it is workable.
The thing is however, that the set of math glyphs do need suitable
extensions; some are already suggested in the new math encoding scheme
(lower case of scripts and outlines, arrows package). Some new suggestions
came up: slanted/upright script fonts, another more scripty series.
Regardless whether that will be a part of the future LaTeX-distribution,
the LaTeX math encoding scheme should enable such extension to more easily
taking place (as it already does).