[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>***Subject**:**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)****From**:*Michael Downes <mjd@MATH.AMS.ORG>***Date**: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 08:16:32 -0400- Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>

[Hans Aberg] > > Is there not a problem here: PostScript fonts may only come in one size, > > which then is rescaled. > > > > But in correct typesetting, as in TeX fonts, the weights and proportions > > actually change with the font size. [Sebastian] > 99% of the typesetting world gets by fine with the (technically > perhaps inferior) optical-scaling-plus-hints of Type1 fonts. (? surely you meant "linear-scaling-plus-hints"?) If a document uses lots of characters at size 7pt and below, the quality difference will be quite noticeable. Otherwise not. In practice this means essentially that only documents with lots of math require optically scaled fonts. Michael Downes, mjd@ams.org

**References**:**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)***From:*Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)** - Next by Date:
**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)** - Next by thread:
**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)** - Index(es):