[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>***Subject**:**Re: math fonts, etc****From**:*Hans Aberg <haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE>***Date**: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 17:49:14 +0200- Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
- Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>

>Well, I think I could come up with my own set of three different lines >that the discussion here follows or should or shouldn't follow. > >1. Implementation of the proposal of Justin Ziegler >2. Design of standard TeX/LaTeX control sequences to access all those > glyphs. >3. Discussion about missing glyphs, fonts, typographical traditions and > rules etc. Frank Mittelbach will have to speak for himself, but I got the impressions that he said that 2 and 3 indeed belong to the LaTeX3 project, but not right now, because he first want to see a working version of 1, and when that has arrived and been evaluated, one can reopen those other discussions, as far as the LaTeX3 project is concerned. Right? -- But I am not sure that the math-fonts-discuss subscribing mechanism is working right now. Hans Aberg

- Prev by Date:
**Some comments on Hans Aberg's points** - Next by Date:
**Re: Alternatives to LaTeX (Was Some comments...)** - Prev by thread:
**Re: math fonts, etc** - Next by thread:
**Re: math fonts, etc** - Index(es):