Thu, 19 Oct 1995 11:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu Oct 19 10:16:17 1995, David Carlisle <email@example.com> wrote:
> Ah in that case I think latex/file.tex would be a very bad syntax for
> this as the current semantics for it on any TeX that accepts / as a
> directory separator *is* that the input path contains a
> directory called latex directly containing a file called file.tex.
Is that _useful_ semantics?
> I'm not sure what a good syntax would be, or even the intended meaning.
> Is \input latex//*//file.tex (say) supposed to restrict the search
> just to the top level texmf/tex/latex subtree or does it search the
> whole tree, including texmf/tex/plain/* looking for a directory latex,
> and then looking below that for a file called file.tex?
The semantics would have to be specified explicitly. I prefer the former.
I don't think the latter would be useful.
> Personally I'd rather the whole notion be dropped, I am sure that some
> version of this idea would be useful, but it just seems too late in
> the day after months of discussions to be adding new ideas to the
I brought this up in June... months ago.
> If it goes in I think it should not suggest any possible syntax and be
> suitably vague about sematics, something like ... if it were possible
> to restrict the search path to a subtree via the use of suitable TeX
> macros .....
That would be fine with me.
--Paul Vojta, firstname.lastname@example.org