Texlive installer as a flatpak package
jakob.jakobson13 at posteo.de
Tue Oct 27 13:31:24 CET 2020
Dear Norbert and Siep,
I get your reasons. I then would propose to the maintainers of the tex
editors to not bundle the texlive package. Instead they could give a
short description how to use the binaries of a manual installation that
have been installed with the netinstaller.
Am 25.10.2020 16:32 schrieb Siep Kroonenberg:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 05:52:05PM +0200, Jakob Jakobson wrote:
>> Dear texlive developers,
>> would anyone of you be interested in (co)maintaining a flatpak version
>> the texlive installer?
>> The background is that flatpak tries to be a new,
>> package format for linux distribution. Currently there are also some
>> editors packaged as flatpak packages, but at the moment each one of
>> brings a full texlive distribution (that I maintain). As this bloats
>> editors unnecessarily, I was wondering if we could just package the
>> installer. In the following, the users could use tlmgr to individually
>> install their latex packages, which would reduce the overall
>> size of the respective editors. Additionally, perhaps it would spread
>> installer more among your users as the installer and tlmgr could be
>> installed and started by a single click.
> I may be totally wrong about this, but isn't something possible with
> custom sandboxing? E.g. with some snap packages users can request
> access to the Documents folders, and for flatpaks there is
> bubblewrap, about which I know even less. So maybe with the right
> sandboxing options and a suitable location of TL, TL might be
> accessible outright from within the sandbox.
> But, like Norbert, I personally stay away from this stuff.
More information about the tex-live