[tex-live] your eqexam package
Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Fri Jul 9 10:23:55 CEST 2010
I can only second Staszek's wise words.
Staszek Wawrykiewicz wrote:
> Ahhh... really pity. For me those packages are the pearls! And all macros
> are signed LPPL anyway. We have so many packages without doc sources
> (like fonts or context), so I still cannot understand why we have such
> restrictions. I dare swear that for open source packages
> we use too much restrictions, or, hmmm... how to say, political
> (american :) correctness. All in all:
> - the program, macro, font IS open source;
> - why we cannot give freedom to the developers to add (also freely
> distributable and readable) the documentation, which is not real,
> workable part of the package itself?
>>>> I believe we went over this before, all my manuals are written with
>>>> TeX, with my own special macros and fonts. A person would not be
>>>> able to
>>>> compile the document from its source, so what's the point.
> Just the case, as Don Story kindly explained.
> All the best,
> Staszek Wawrykiewicz
> staw at gust.org.pl
More information about the tex-live