[tex-live] Conflits in gsfonts packge and tex-live distro
pander at users.sourceforge.net
Fri May 22 08:44:32 CEST 2009
Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> On 20 May 2009 Pander wrote:
> Walter Schmidt created the TeX support files (tfm, map, ... -files)
> and is maintaining them, plus a set of LaTeX macros, plus the
> associated fonts.
> *** You cannot use these font metrics with any other font. ***
> One reason Walter decided to use the original URW fonts is that they
> had been regarded as replacements for the built-in printer fonts.
> People can use the URW fonts for previewing and the built-in printer
> fonts for printing. In this case it doesn't make sense to add any new
> glyphs because they will not appear on paper anyway.
> IMO the gsfonts are obsolete. There are the TeX Gyre fonts now which
> contain Cyrillic and Vietnamese glyphs too, and Greek, Slovenian,...
> Each font file contains abt. 1200 glyphs and almost all Latin
> languages are supported (maybe support for some rare African scripts
> is missing). There are real small caps and oldstyle numerals...
> I think that it's best to replace gsfonts by them former or later.
> Last time I asked Jacko whether he wants to ask Ghostscript developers
> to ship gs with TeX Gyre, he said "Not yet, maybe later.", but this
> had been a few years ago. Maybe it's worthwhile to ask him again.
Did anyone ask Jacko or Ghostscript developers about this situation and
that the "maybe later" could be in 2009?
More information about the tex-live