New set of binaries for TL5 (linux)
Kaja P. Christiansen
Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:02:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Our network crashed for a day and my earlier follow-up (enclosed below)
apparently didn't make it.
> > Perhaps for TL5c it would be wise using glibc2.0 which should work
> > with 2.1?
> Right. And, try to use the system with the oldest glibc2.0 that you
> can find.
Fwiw, I compiled a new set yesterday, using Red Hat 5.2 /glibc-2.0, for pdftex:
libstdc++.so.2.8 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x40003000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40044000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4005f000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00000000)
Staszek, if this set solves the problems that you've heard of, it can easily
be uploaded to sun2.dante.de. otherwise, someone else has to look into it...
From: "Kaja P. Christiansen" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: New set of binaries for TL5
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:26:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Sebastian Rahtz writes:
> > on many installations, even e.g. on SuSE with glibc 2.1 (??).
> > As I know, compiling with glibc2.0 should work also with glibc2.1.
> > Sebastian, which version of lib was used?
> Kaja made the binaries, she can comment better on her setup
Binaries were build with glibc-2.1. We have a single linux box
with glibc-2.0, so in principle they could be redone.